FINAL SYNTHESIS BLOG
POST
As the course draws to an end and reflections are being made,
the topics of each week leading up to this point have broadened my
understanding as it pertains to the foundations of health. Each week built upon
the previous week’s information and helped to form the image that health is a
multi-factorial concept, that is continuously evolving and that may not present
the same for everyone.
I have provided a synthesis of the major topics covered
through this course with embedded links to my previously posted blogs about the
topic.
Background and Profession
As a nuclear medicine technologist, I act as a direct patient
care provider in my clinical setting. I utilize radiopharmaceuticals in order
to assess the function of organs through imaging techniques. I work in the
Canadian healthcare system where public access to healthcare services are the
responsibility of the provincial governments. This in turn can cause
discrepancies in what is accessible and to whom, depending on the province or
territory that the individual lives in. My understanding of health was formed
originally during my bachelor’s degree based on the definition established in
1948 by the World Health Organization. “Health is a state of complete physical,
mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”.
(WHO, n.d.)
Re-defining Health
We were challenged to find definitions that were more
applicable which led me to the concept of positive health. This concept refers
to an individual’s ability to self-manage and adapt to their environment (Huber,
2011). With the prevalence of chronic diseases (such as diabetes and
hypertension) being a major health concern in Canada, assessing prevention and
management is pertinent to reducing these disease rates. Frameworks have been
established across the country with each province having their own (but often
overlying) health priorities.
Determinants of Health
To aim for prevention, we needed to understand the
determinants of health. The WHO lists three determinants that take a 'Big
Picture' view:
- Physical environment (including shelter; stable ecosystem; peace; sustainable resources);
- Social Environment (income; education; social security; equity; social justice and respect for human rights; access to health care services);
- Biological and Behavioural determinants (genetic factors; ethnicity; lifestyle, such as smoking, immigration, etc.)
![]() |
(Colleaga, n.d.) |
Whereas the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) lists 12
determinants of health:
- Physical
environments;
- Employment
and working conditions;
- Social
environments;
- Social
support networks;
- Health
services;
- Culture;
- Income
and social status;
- Education
and literacy;
- Personal
health practices and coping skills;
- Healthy
child development;
- Biology
and genetic endowment;
- Gender. ("Determinants: Definitions and Core Concepts", 2017).
Chronic Kidney Disease
I have always had an interest in the kidneys and therefore, I
chose chronic kidney disease (CKD) as my focus. As a chronic disease that often
arises from the presence of other chronic diseases such as the ones mentioned
above, the prevention of these underlying diseases could reduce the prevalence
of CKD. CKD, as are other chronic diseases, is often seen in persons with lower
socio-economic statuses (which is a major determinant of health). Prevalence
tends to be higher in minority groups, older persons, persons with lower
educational achievement and incomes. (Nicholas, Kalantar-Zadeh & Norris, 2015)
![]() |
(Sieben, 2017) |
Understanding a chronic disease such as CKD and how various physical
and socio-economic health determinants influence the disease was done using the
socio-ecological model. This model incorporates an inter-related influence at the
intrapersonal, interpersonal, community, organizational and policy level.
Levels of Influence
The intrapersonal level refers to the characteristics of the
individual that influences their disease and decision. The interpersonal level
refers to social network surrounding the individual that has an influence on
them. The community level refers to the physical environment and surroundings
of the individual while the organizational and societal levels refer to establishments
and policies that may directly or indirectly affect how a person’s disease is managed.
(UNICEF, 2014)
After gaining further knowledge on the determinants of
health and a basic idea of the category of persons who are more likely to
report reduced health, the issue of vulnerability arises. Due to the correlation and causation of several health
determinants on chronic kidney disease, many persons with the disease fall
under the category of “vulnerable populations”.
Vulnerable populations are at
risk for disparate healthcare access and outcomes because of economic,
cultural, ethnic or health characteristics. Vulnerable populations include
patients who are racial or ethnic minorities, children, elderly,
socioeconomically disadvantaged, underinsured or those with certain medical
conditions. Members of vulnerable populations often have health conditions that
are exacerbated by unnecessarily inadequate healthcare. (Waisel, 2013)
Vulnerable Populations
The focus was then shifted to the Aboriginal community in
Canada as these Indigenous persons are known to experience lower levels of
health due to socio-economic factors such as lower education and income level, physical
environment and accessibility and implemented policies. (Lendsay, n.d.). Indigenous
persons’ health, unlike other non-Indigenous Canadians, fall under the federal
jurisdiction, not provincial/territorial. These persons include First Nations,
Inuit and Métis and who due to negative perceptions (e.g. alcoholism) can face
racism at times while seeking treatment, leaving them under-served. (University
of Ottawa, 2017)
This tied in well with my secondary focus of immigrant health as immigrants are often considered vulnerable populations, particularly
refugees. Although most legal immigrants arrive in Canada healthier than the
average Canadians (Healthy Immigrant Effect), these persons often arrive in
Canada with no money and limited understanding of English or French. Refugees
may present with physical ailments or impaired mental statuses due to traumatization and poor living conditions from time spent in war-stricken areas and refugee camps. (Gushula, Pottie, Roberts,
Torres & DesMeules, 2011)
Future Health
We started by looking at the past, established Health Care Acts and Health definitions. We analyzed and criticized the present as we broadened our knowledge on current health issues within Canada (i.e. chronic disease management and prevention). Finally, we are on the topic of future health and technology.
We started by looking at the past, established Health Care Acts and Health definitions. We analyzed and criticized the present as we broadened our knowledge on current health issues within Canada (i.e. chronic disease management and prevention). Finally, we are on the topic of future health and technology.
Linking back to chronic disease management and the concept of
positive health and self-management, there has been a push to allow patients
and their families to be key participants in their treatment. The use of
digital devices and portable equipment allows patients to be more involved in
their own healthcare and allows a better flow of communication between patient
and healthcare practitioner. (De Guzman, 2017)
Arcus Consulting Group (n.d.) further expands on this
utilization of technology by stating,
In the future, the patient will
be able to manage much of this from her home and mobile phone–a convenience
that not only saves her time and money, but also gives her peace of mind. With
the wireless monitoring devices and community networks, she will have access to
more tailored and complete information to assist her in making the best health
and financial choices. Ongoing management and awareness also helps prevent
costly, time consuming, and perhaps life-threatening emergencies for her and
her family.
Advances are also being seen in the world of nuclear medicine
with major impacts to renal health. Geist et al. (2018) have concluded that the
newest imaging modality of PET/MR can be used to accurately represent renal
health in healthy subjects based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and
effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) which are both major indicators of kidney function.
This new study could be proven to be transferable to those with acute and
chronic kidney disease.
Conclusion
As a healthcare professional, it is my duty to remain
abreast of changes and advances within my field and within the Canadian (and possibly
global) health system. This course has provided me with the tools to research
and curate resources that are not only beneficial to me professionally as a
nuclear medicine technologist, academically as a master’s student but also
personally, as a healthcare consumer. Throughout the weeks and in this final
synthesis, I feel like I truly possess a better foundation in the Canadian
Health System.
References
Arcus
Consulting Group. (n.d.). Healthcare Trends in Canada. Retrieved from https://arcusgroup.ca/services/non-profit/hospitalshealthcare/healthcare-trends-in-canada/
Colleaga.
(n.d.). What are the Determinants of
Health? [Image]. Retrieved from https://www.colleaga.org/article/what-are-determinants-health
Constitution of WHO: principles. (n.d.). Retrieved
from http://www.who.int/about/mission/en/
De Guzman, M.
(2017). Health care trends to watch for in 2018. Retrieved from https://www.canadianchiropractor.ca/leadership/health-care-outlook-4798
Determinants:
Definitions and Core Concepts. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.med.uottawa.ca/sim/data/Pub_Determinants_e.htm
Geist, B.,
Baltzer, P., Fueger, B., Hamboeck, M., Nakuz, T., & Papp, L. et al. (2018).
Assessing the kidney function parameters glomerular filtration rate and
effective renal plasma flow with dynamic FDG-PET/MRI in healthy subjects. EJNMMI
Research, 8(1). doi: 10.1186/s13550-018-0389-1
Gushulak, B.,
Pottie, K., Roberts, J., Torres, S., & DesMeules, M. (2011). Migration and
health in Canada: health in the global village. Canadian Medical
Association Journal, 183(12), E952-E958. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090287
Huber, M.
(2011). Health: How should we define it? British Medical Journal, 343, (7817),
235-237. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4163
Lendsay, K.
(n.d.). Indigenous Health Issues in Canada [Blog]. Retrieved from https://www.express-
scripts.ca/raising-health/Indigenous-Health-Issues-in-Canada
Nicholas, S.,
Kalantar-Zadeh, K., & Norris, K. (2015). Socioeconomic Disparities in
Chronic Kidney Disease. Advances In Chronic Kidney Disease, 22(1),
6-15. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2014.07.002
Sieben, A.
(2017). Chronic Kidney Disease Facts [Image]. Retrieved from https://villa-medica.com/cell-therapy-for-ckd/
UNICEF. What
are the Social Ecological Model (SEM), Communication for Development (C4D)?.
(2014). Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/cbsc/files/Module_1_-_MNCHN_C4D_Guide.docx
University of
Ottawa. (2017). Indigenous health. Retrieved from http://www.med.uottawa.ca/SIM/data/Vul_Indigenous_e.htm
Waisel, D.
(2013). Vulnerable populations in healthcare. Current Opinion In
Anaesthesiology, 26(2), 186-192. doi: 10.1097/aco.0b013e32835e8c17
Comments
Post a Comment